PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram Writer
Generates a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram from screening counts
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram Writer
Generates a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram from screening counts
Showcase
Description
Generates a PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagram text and protocol paragraph for researchers conducting systematic reviews. When you enter your database screening counts (identification → screening → eligibility → included), it checks the consistency of the numbers and produces text defensible against the reviewer question "why does your flow diagram lose so many records?" It also converts your inclusion/exclusion criteria into a PICO/PECO-format table. Suitable for: graduate students, academics, and journal editors' pre-checks for systematic review/meta-analysis papers. If it detects a numeric inconsistency (e.g., included > eligibility) it states this explicitly rather than silently correcting it.
Recommended by
Shuting@YouMind
Why we love this skill
An editor’s pick for turning raw screening counts into a defensible PRISMA 2020 narrative. It checks numerical consistency, explains exclusions at every stage, and produces a Methods-ready protocol paragraph plus PICO/PECO criteria table.
Best for
Researchers, graduate students, and editors preparing or pre-checking systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
How to use this Skill
Provide your input
Provide your review topic, databases, date range, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and screening counts for identification, duplicates, screening, eligibility, and inclusion.
Run the Skill
The Skill checks the counts for consistency and turns your review information into a PRISMA 2020 flow summary, protocol paragraph, and PICO/PECO criteria table.
Review your result
Receive review-ready text explaining record losses and exclusions, a Methods-style protocol paragraph, and a structured inclusion/exclusion table.
Related Skills
View all
ResearchMeta-Analysis Full Report Writer
Produces a complete Methods + Results + Limitations text compliant with PRISMA 2020 and the Cochrane Handbook from your meta-analysis statistics (pooled effect size, I², Q, tau², publication bias indicators). Never misinterprets the I² value (including the "percentage of variance" framing); avoids overstated causal language (uses cautious phrasing like "findings are consistent with..." instead of "evidence demonstrates that"). At the end, it also offers at least 3 questions a reviewer might ask along with defense sentences. Suitable for: researchers writing a meta-analysis paper who want to strengthen the methods section before journal submission. What it does not do: it does not perform statistical calculations from raw data (you must already have your R/RevMan/CMA output) — it only converts and interprets your results into academic text.
ResearchCONSORT 2010 Report Writer
From your randomized controlled trial (RCT) data — randomization method, blinding status, power analysis, CONSORT flow numbers (screened/randomized/allocated/analyzed), ITT/PP analysis approach — it produces a complete Abstract + Methods + Results draft compliant with all 25 items of CONSORT 2010. It never confuses ITT/PP; it checks the consistency of flow diagram numbers (randomized ≥ allocated ≥ followed-up ≥ analyzed). It also pre-identifies at least 4 objections journal reviewers frequently raise (e.g., "why wasn't an ITT analysis reported," "was blinding success tested," "was there outcome switching") and suggests a defense sentence for each. Designed for clinical researchers in medicine/nursing/pharmacy conducting RCTs who want methodological robustness before journal submission. What it does not do: it does not perform statistical analysis or generate data — it only converts results you already have into a CONSORT-standard report.
ResearchPRISMA 2020 Flowchart Writer
For researchers conducting systematic reviews, this Skill generates flowchart text and a protocol paragraph that follow the PRISMA 2020 checklist. When you enter your database screening counts (identification → screening → eligibility → included), it checks the numbers for consistency and produces defensible text addressing a reviewer's question: "Why does your flowchart show so many losses?" It also converts your inclusion and exclusion criteria into a table in PICO/PECO format. This Skill is suitable for graduate students writing systematic reviews or meta-analyses, as well as journal editors conducting pre-publication checks. If it detects a numerical inconsistency (for example, included > eligibility), it states this clearly rather than silently correcting it.
Information
- Version
- v2
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
- Use cases
- Writing & contentResearch & analysis
- What you get
- ReportDocumentDiagram
