Doomsday Innovation Expert
Doomsday Innovation Expert
Showcase
Description
An expert skill for writing the “Innovations” section of applications to the National Social Science Fund of China and the Ministry of Education’s Humanities and Social Sciences programs. Based on the Lecture 8 methodology and the 2024 revised application-form standards, it covers two major categories: academic viewpoints and research methods. Academic viewpoint innovations follow three models: theoretical integration, contextual modification, and problem reframing. Methodological innovations follow three paths: data sources, analytical tools, and interdisciplinary integration. It uses a “viewpoint statement + brief explanation” writing technique, with button confirmation at each step before proceeding.
Related Skills
View all
Research Value Red Team
An expert skill for the research value section of National Social Science Fund and Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences applications—the Topic Collision Radar edition. Built on Lecture 8, Lecture 64, a case library of five winning proposal templates, and a knowledge base of 535 funded-project lists, it provides: topic-collision radar searches across three comparison levels (National Social Science Fund → Ministry of Education → provincial philosophy and social sciences), with project status labels → six-dimensional difference analysis and collision warnings → T1–T5 academic value formulas and A1–A4 applied value formulas → format-adaptive output ("Academic Value + Applied Value" for the National Social Science Fund application’s free-form section / "Theoretical Value + Practical Application Value" for Ministry of Education Form B, limited to 2,000 Chinese characters). Includes a four-sentence template for "new progress compared with similar projects already funded." Confirm each step with a button to proceed. The term "空白" is prohibited in the output and is always replaced with specific wording such as "blind spots," "gaps," "weak areas," or "research limitations."
Doomsday Research Content Gen
Expert skill for National Social Science Fund (NSSF) or Ministry of Education (MOE) humanities and social science project applications. Based on the methodology from the 4th lecture on 'Research Content' (five pillars, problem tree and problem chain, six techniques, and intuitive clarity), it generates research objects, research objectives (two versions: lecture style and expert standard style), overall framework, key points and difficulties, research plan, and feasibility through multi-round interaction. Each step requires the user to confirm and proceed.
ResearchProject Proposal Expert v3.0
From vague ideas to logically rigorous application materials, even ordinary technical personnel can complete a 10,000-word argumentation report in 2 hours. Core Features: Eliminate empty language in applications: automatically strip out filler words like 'high-level' and 'significantly improved', use SCQA framework + Pyramid Principle to write quantified, logically rigorous arguments. Accurately identify innovation patterns: automatically analyze project characteristics, match three modes (autonomous originality, integrated innovation, iterative micro-innovation), give compatibility score and recommendation, avoid failure due to mispositioned innovation. Prevent logic gaps in argumentation: exclusive 'five elements + three chapters' structured output method, from project rationale to innovation points tightly linked, master 10,000-word deep report + high-definition technology roadmap. Zero experience required: no idea? Just input a one-sentence project idea (e.g., 'want to make a quantum sensor for gas leak detection'), system automatically completes 6 phases, outputs complete application materials. Usage: Open the dialogue box and directly input your project idea or upload existing materials; the system will guide you through the entire process: information collection → innovation mode selection → brief argumentation generation → full report generation → technology roadmap generation. Each phase has a confirmation mechanism, and you can flexibly exit and iterate. About V3.2: The new V3.2 version integrates five methodologies: SCQA framework, SMART principles, Pyramid Principle, Comparison-Difference-Advantage method, and Three-Dimensional Value method. It has been refined through real-world cases in quantum detection, smart elderly care, energy management, and other fields, locking in the underlying logic of research proposal success—an essential tool for successful project applications! Application scenarios: ✅ National Natural Science Foundation applications ✅ Provincial/municipal science and technology plan projects ✅ Enterprise technology innovation project initiation ✅ Graduate thesis proposal writing ✅ Technology achievement transformation plan design Core advantages: 🎯 Efficiency increase by 10x: from 2-3 weeks to 2-3 hours 📊 Quality professional guarantee: quantified indicators, rigorous logic, prominent innovation points 🔄 Flexible and controllable: each phase can be confirmed, modified, or exited 📈 Validated by real cases: successfully generated multiple 10,000-word deep reports Typical output examples: ✅ 10,000-word deep argumentation report ✅ High-definition technology roadmap ✅ Structured brief argumentation ✅ SCQA diagnostic analysis report ✅ Innovation mode compatibility assessment
Information
- Version
- v2
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
