Top 10 Cognitive Bias Shield
1
Top 10 Cognitive Bias Shield
1
Showcase
Description
Enable this skill when tasks involve objective judgment, decision analysis, content creation, knowledge organization, design review, pricing strategy, or logical reasoning. It enforces comprehensive resistance against cognitive biases—with confirmation bias as the central challenge—while systematically defeating anchoring, survivorship bias, the Dunning–Kruger effect, loss aversion, the planning fallacy, and the halo effect. Use this skill when output quality depends on rationality, truth, and freedom from mental shortcuts rather than intuition or preference.
Related Skills
View all
Multi-Framework Analysis
Turn complex problems into structured, multi-perspective analyses that can be reviewed, verified, and used to support next steps. Whether you are evaluating career choices, business and product decisions, social phenomena, controversial issues, trending topics, innovations, or abstract concepts, this Skill first clarifies the subject, goals, constraints, known information, and key unknowns. It then selects complementary cognitive frameworks based on the task, avoiding a pileup of concepts or repeated versions of the same conclusion. The analysis clearly distinguishes between information provided by the user, verified facts, general principles, assumptions, inferences, and content that still needs validation. It places evidence, mechanisms, counterevidence, alternative explanations, and uncertainty within a clear chain of reasoning. For time-sensitive, controversial, specialized, or high-risk facts, it can use targeted web searches and verify original sources. When sources conflict, it preserves the differences rather than filling gaps with unverified data or overly certain claims. The final output typically includes a problem profile; the framework selection and analysis of each framework; areas of agreement and disagreement across perspectives; sensitive variables; blind spots and failure conditions; and conditional conclusions with confidence levels. It does not replace professional medical, legal, investment, tax, or other advice. Instead, it helps you identify the factors that truly affect judgment and design minimal validation steps, information-gathering plans, decision gates, or reversible next steps. Simple questions can be condensed into a brief assessment, while complex or multi-subject tasks can be developed into a complete analytical report.
LessWrong: Disputes & Decisions
Turn controversial issues, policy discussions, article arguments, and comment-section disputes into clearer, testable analysis that can guide action. This skill draws on the LessWrong rationalist tradition, but does not represent an official LessWrong position. Its focus is not on winning debates, but on distinguishing facts, causal explanations, value judgments, policy proposals, predictions, and personal strategies—and avoiding the mistake of treating emotion, conviction, or volume as evidence. It helps you examine evidence quality, unknowns, base rates, and alternative explanations; identify exaggerated claims such as “everyone thinks,” anecdotal reasoning presented as a general rule, attacks on motives, and identity-based arguments; and steelman the other side’s most reasonable position. It also looks for the real disagreements that would change the conclusion and analyzes the relationship between incentives, constraints, and practical action. Whether you are reviewing a controversial article, improving your own argument, understanding a comment-section conflict, or comparing options with incomplete information, you will receive tentative conclusions, key reservations, conditions for updating your judgment, and suggested next steps. For time-sensitive or specialized facts, it will clearly identify what needs further verification rather than filling gaps with false certainty.
Plan Vulnerability Scanner
🛡️ **One-sentence value**: Enter your plan, proposal, or decision, and an AI red-team expert systematically surfaces every potential vulnerability, so you can see the risk before you fail. 🔍 **Core features**: - **Five-dimensional red-team scan**: logical assumptions, market and users, competition and substitutes, execution and resources, finance and profitability—attack from every angle - **Severity rating**: Critical🔴 / High🟠 / Medium🟡 / Low🟢—so you know what to tackle first - **Transparent attack logic**: every risk point includes the red team's reasoning, not guesswork - **Scoring system**: independent score for each of the five dimensions + an overall confidence score - **Actionable mitigation recommendations**: not just criticism—it tells you what to do 🎯 **Use cases**: - 📄 Business plan/BP: plug all logic gaps before meeting investors - 🚀 New product/feature planning: run a red-team test before launch to avoid pitfalls - 📊 Strategic decisions: assess risks in major decisions such as market entry, M&A, and transformation - 💰 Fundraising/budget proposals: find the most fragile assumptions in financial forecasts - 🏗️ Project execution plans: spot traps on the execution path before work begins 👩💼 **Who it's for**: founders, product managers, strategy leads, investors, project managers—anyone who needs to make decisions based on a plan.
Information
- Version
- v3
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
