AI Textbook Quality Inspector
Make AI-written textbooks pass review
AI Textbook Quality Inspector
Make AI-written textbooks pass review
Showcase
Description
📚 AI Textbook Quality Inspector — Five-dimensional scan to make AI-written textbooks withstand review Textbooks written with AI assistance suffer from five common problems: hard-to-detect knowledge errors, instructional design lacking classroom feel, excessive 'correct but empty' statements, templated writing that feels robotic, and obscure language that makes students give up reading. This system performs a five-dimensional in-depth quality check chapter by chapter, examining each chapter from the perspectives of four roles: subject matter expert, instructional designer, fact-checker, and style reviewer. It outputs quantitative scores and directly replaceable modification suggestions. Five Dimensions: 📐 Knowledge Accuracy — Trace and correct concepts, models, and data one by one, with each error annotated with a source 🎯 Instructional Design — Review difficulty curve, prerequisite preparation, and chapter connections like a seasoned teacher 💎 Content Substantiveness — Expose 'correct but empty' statements, calculate real information gain per section 🤖 AI-Flavor Detection — Textbook-specific standards to distinguish normal writing from AI template patterns 📖 Readability — Paragraph rhythm, term density, assess whether students can read smoothly Highlight Features: 🔗 Cross-Chapter Consistency — Automatically generate knowledge profile, detect conceptual contradictions, inconsistent terminology, and duplicate definitions 🔄 Closed-Loop Iteration — After revision, resubmit and automatically track improvements, remaining issues, and new problems 📊 Layered Report — First see overview score + top 3 issues, then expand section-by-section analysis as needed 🎤 Sharp Commentary — No sugarcoating; if a definition is wrong, it says so bluntly, with each criticism accompanied by a revision reference Applicable to: AI-assisted undergraduate and graduate textbooks, academic monographs, and course handouts. Current version is optimized for undergraduate textbooks, but also works for graduate textbooks. Paste chapter → Get score → Make targeted revisions → Re-test until quality passes.
Related Skills
View all
WriteAIGC Reduction & Rewrite v7.0
📚 Academic Paper AIGC Reduction and Quality-Preserving Rewriting Expert v7.0 Designed for graduate students, researchers, and paper authors, this academic text optimization skill operates on a core closed loop of 'source control → process correction → result verification → reverse self-check → iterative re-check'. It systematically diagnoses and optimizes issues such as templated expressions, mechanical logic, vague content, inaccurate terminology, and style inconsistencies while preserving original meaning, technical terms, data, and core conclusions. 🔍📝 🌟 Core Capabilities 🔬 Multi-layer Risk Diagnosis Covers 10 types of universal text fingerprints and assists in identifying common expression patterns of models such as ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, and Wenxin Yiyan. 🧠 Deep Semantic Restructuring Goes beyond synonym replacement to rebuild more natural and in-depth academic reasoning by adjusting proposition expression, information order, argument approach, and evidence organization. ✍️ Quality-Preserving Rewriting Comprehensively applies 13 sentence transformation strategies and 20 methods for cleaning high-frequency templated expressions, improving mechanical sentence structures, repetitive connectors, and overly rigid formatting. 📊 Full-text Structure Diagnosis Through macro-cycle and five key triangles, checks whether research problems, theory, literature review, methods, results, conclusions, and innovation form a complete closed loop. 🧩 Fine-grained Section Adaptation Develops differentiated diagnostic and rewriting strategies for abstract, introduction, literature review, research methods, results, discussion, and conclusion respectively. 🌐 Cross-language Risk Scanning Assists in identifying translationese, passive voice stacking, long sentence nesting, and mixed Chinese-English formatting abnormalities to make Chinese academic expression more natural and accurate. 🔄 Reverse Self-check Loop After rewriting, re-verifies from three aspects: technique distribution, new text fingerprints, and information integrity, to avoid 'becoming more templated' or losing key content. 🛡️ Academic Integrity Protection Does not fabricate literature, data, cases, or policy evidence; separately marks information requiring author verification and reminds users to honestly disclose AI usage. 🎯 Use Cases ✅ Single paragraph or partial section optimization ✅ Targeted modification of marked paragraphs from inspection reports ✅ Polishing of abstract, introduction, literature review, discussion, and conclusion ✅ Full-text AIGC risk feature diagnosis ✅ Language and structure adaptation for target journals ✅ Pre-submission quality review and consistency check 📦 Final Deliverables 📄 Quality-preserving rewritten text 🔎 Risk and issue diagnosis report 🛠️ Rewriting strategy and technique description ✅ Reverse self-check and information integrity report 💡 Items requiring author verification and subsequent revision suggestions 🎓 Original meaning preserved · Logic intact · No fabricated data · Academic quality maintained ⚠️ This skill aims to improve academic expression quality and reduce text risk features. It does not guarantee passage through any specific detection platform or achieving a particular detection score.
HE Document Write&Review v3.0
🎯 Got your application rejected? Can't find the highlight for your proposal? Don't know where to start with review comments? Three real scenarios: 🔸 Scenario 1: Application season anxiety—Reviewer feedback: "Insufficient theoretical support, vague policy basis." Unsure which documents to cite or which theoretical framework to use. 🔸 Scenario 2: Proposal writing dilemma—In charge of course construction plan: objectives, tasks, pathways, evaluation… each part needs writing, but you feel the logic is not rigorous enough and worry about being questioned on "feasibility" during review. 🔸 Scenario 3: Review dilemma—Need to write peer review comments: must point out issues while maintaining professionalism, be well-founded but not too harsh. How to strike the balance? 💡 What can this system do for you? Not just give advice—it writes, revises, and reviews for you directly. 📝 Writing Mode: From topic to final document Enter your topic and existing materials. The system automatically identifies the document type (application/proposal/report/review). Automatically matches authoritative policy documents and theoretical support. Generates content chapter by chapter, each with evidence, logic, and facts. Key promise: Never fabricates data; clearly tells you what's missing. 🔍 Review Mode: Expert-level diagnosis Upload your text. Professional scoring across 7 dimensions (value, alignment, completeness, innovation, feasibility, support, expression quality). Precisely identifies problem areas. Provides specific revision suggestions + example rewrites. Not general advice, but paragraph-level specific guidance. ✏️ Revision Optimization Mode: Precision enhancement Strengthens arguments based on existing text. Optimizes expression, eliminates empty talk and clichés. Standardizes terminology and logic. Improves overall competitiveness. ⚡ Three Core Mechanisms (Unique) 🛡️ Firewall Mechanism Built-in "fact boundary": User-provided real data is never fabricated; policy basis must have sources; theoretical support cannot be misapplied. Every sentence you see can be traced back to its source. 🔄 Multi-core Adversarial Engine One core writes, another specifically checks for errors. Like having a strict auditor watching, ensuring no "unsubstantiated facts," "logic gaps," or "policy mismatches" occur. 📊 Stepwise Guidance Doesn't ask you 20 questions at once—identifies the most critical gaps and asks only the 3–5 most necessary questions. After each stage, clearly tells you "what's done," "what's missing," and "what to do next." 🎯 Scope of Application (All Higher Education Scenarios) ✅ Teaching achievement award applications (institutional/provincial/national) ✅ Quality engineering project applications (top courses/teaching teams/textbooks, etc.) ✅ Course construction plans, major construction plans ✅ Major self-assessment reports, course acceptance reports ✅ Expert review comments, peer reviews ✅ Education reform project applications, closing reports 🚀 User Experience Writing an application from scratch: Provide the topic and basic materials → System identifies document type, takes inventory, matches policies and theories → Generates outline → Writes chapter by chapter → Consolidates → Get a draft in 1 hour. Reviewing existing text: Upload document → System automatically scores → Lists main issues → Provides revision suggestions and example rewrites → Get review report in 20 minutes. Optimizing existing plan: Provide existing text and optimization direction → System diagnoses weaknesses → Strengthens arguments, optimizes expression → Get optimized version in 30 minutes. 👉 Try it now—make higher education document writing no longer a burden. This is not just a writing assistant; it's an intelligent engine that understands higher education rules, review standards, and professional expression.
Course Design Assistant v7.0
💡 What can this assistant do for you? An expert with years of experience in instructional design and lesson plan writing, guiding you step by step to create professional-level instructional designs. (Offline training valued at least ¥3000 per session.) 📋 13-step standardized process, scientific and rigorous, no omissions From course information collection → learning situation analysis → pain point diagnosis → key/difficult point confirmation → objective writing (draft + refinement) → teaching model selection → AI tool integration → process design → evaluation design → board design → complete plan → multi-format delivery Each step includes quality checks to ensure no skipped steps, no omissions, and no vague content. 🎯 Automatic ABCD principle check, no more headaches in objective writing The system automatically checks each objective against the ABCD principle and tags Bloom's taxonomy levels (L1-L6). 📊 Dedicated "Advancedity, Innovation, Challenge" check, aligned with first-class course standards No more worrying about reviewers saying "insufficient challenge." The system quantifies the check for you. 🧠 Intelligent Bloom's taxonomy matching, automatically achieving higher-order thinking The system includes a Bloom's verb classification table (L1-L6) and automatically identifies: Each objective is automatically tagged with its level, ensuring the proportion of higher-order objectives meets standards. 🎨 Natural integration of curriculum-based ideological and political education, no more forced labeling The system provides 5 integration strategies: - Situational embedding: Introduce through real cases/historical stories (e.g., "China's high-speed rail control system from import to independent innovation") - Behavioral concretization: Replace abstract concepts with observable behaviors (e.g., "Identify violations in engineering accidents" rather than "Improve professional ethics") - Value conflict: Set ethical dilemmas to guide judgment (e.g., "Economic benefits vs. environmental protection") - Cultural inheritance: Introduce through traditional culture/institutional advantages (e.g., "The artisan spirit of ancient astronomical instruments") - Comprehensive literacy goals: Covering scientific literacy, engineering literacy, innovation literacy, digital literacy, values, humanistic literacy, and global perspective ⏱️ Time-driven design to ensure the teaching process is implementable Automatically calculate the total time for each segment Compare with the total time set by the user If the error exceeds ±5 minutes, automatically alert and provide adjustment suggestions No more awkward situations where "the design looks great but there isn't enough class time" 🤖 Deep integration of AI tools, supporting higher-order thinking rather than just efficiency improvement Three-tier architecture: - L1 Tool layer: Visualization, real-time feedback, virtual simulation - L2 Teaching layer: Personalized paths, layered tasks, collaborative support - L3 Innovation layer: AI as debate opponent, decision simulation, design assistance Only recommends domestic AI tools (Wenxin Yiyan, Tongyi Qianwen, Doubao, etc.), supports integration of teacher-built intelligent agents 📐 Comprehensive evaluation design, perfect objective-activity-assessment alignment - Diagnostic evaluation: Pre-class assessment - Formative evaluation: Process monitoring (classroom questioning, group discussion, lab reports) - Summative evaluation: Outcome validation (exams, project presentations) For L4-L6 higher-order objectives, automatically generate evaluation rubrics including four dimensions: "Depth of analysis, Innovation, Argument quality, Critical thinking" 🎭 Two working modes to suit different needs - Mode A (Quick output): Provide basic information → System automatically completes steps 2-11 → Outputs complete plan directly → Suitable for time-constrained users who trust AI judgment - Mode B (Step-by-step interaction): Gradually confirm each step → User can modify at any time → Suitable for fine-tuning and deep involvement Regardless of mode, 4 delivery formats are available: Detailed version, concise version, visual web page, teaching process framework diagram ⚡ Six core competitive advantages (unique features) 🔬 1. Scientific process, not based on intuition 13-step standardized process strictly executed in order, no skipping. Each step has clear output and quality check to ensure the design aligns with educational principles. 📊 2. Quantitative check of "Advancedity, Innovation, Challenge" Automatically detect advancedity (proportion of higher-order objectives ≥50%), innovation (real situations + innovative modes), and challenge (open-ended questions + interdisciplinary integration), aligned with first-class course standards. 🎯 3. Automatic ABCD principle verification Each objective must include "Condition-Behavior-Standard," with observable and measurable action verbs. The system automatically checks and tags Bloom's levels. 🧠 4. Intelligent Bloom's taxonomy matching Built-in L1-L6 verb classification table, automatically identifies objective levels, ensures higher-order thinking standards are met, no more worrying about reviewers saying "objective level is too low." ⏱️ 5. Time-driven design Automatically calculate segment durations, compare with total duration, alert if error exceeds ±5 minutes, ensuring the teaching design is implementable and within time limits. 📐 6. Perfect objective-activity-assessment alignment Constructive Alignment principle ensures consistency among "teaching objectives, teaching activities, and assessment methods." Each objective has corresponding activities and evaluations. 🎯 Applicable scenarios (covering all higher education) ✅ Teaching competitions: Teaching innovation competitions, young teacher teaching competitions, classroom teaching contests ✅ Course construction: First-class course applications, curriculum-based ideological and political demonstration courses, blended course design ✅ Daily teaching: New lesson preparation, teaching reform, teaching model innovation ✅ Teaching evaluation: Peer review, supervisory observation, teaching quality assessment ✅ Teacher development: New teacher training, teaching ability enhancement, teaching research 🚀 User experience Quick mode (Mode A): Provide course name, chapter, major, class hours → Select Mode A → System automatically completes 13-step process → Get complete teaching design in 30 minutes → Choose delivery format (detailed/concise/visual web page/framework diagram) Detailed mode (Mode B): Provide basic information → Select Mode B → Gradually confirm learning situation analysis, pain point diagnosis, key/difficult points, teaching objectives, teaching model, AI tools, teaching process, evaluation design, board design → Modify at each step → Complete high-quality teaching design in 1-2 hours Review mode: Upload existing teaching design → System evaluates step by step against all elements → Summarize three strengths and three weaknesses → Provide specific and actionable optimization suggestions → Generate a standardized and well-formatted evaluation report document
Information
- Version
- v4
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
