Literature Review-AFP
Literature Review-AFP
Showcase
Description
Academic paper literature review
Related Skills
View all
ResearchAI-Assisted Literature Review
Guides users through a structured process for writing academic literature reviews based on the Five-Source AFP methodology. It covers four core stages: building the review background, developing a classification framework, conducting critical evaluation, and deriving research gaps. Built-in anti-hallucination safeguards, iterative loop validation, and academic compliance checks help ensure literature review text that is academically sound and logically rigorous.
Social Science Lit Review
A staged guidance system for narrative literature reviews in the social sciences. It follows the AFP methodology—building the background → creating a classification framework → critical evaluation → deriving research gaps → integration audit—to gather information step by step, save intermediate results, and generate a review with traceable citations. Example: “Use the Social Science Literature Review Guide to help me write a literature review.” Scenario: undergraduate thesis proposal; topic example: mechanisms for improving organizational resilience in small and medium-sized enterprises undergoing digital transformation; literature: Zhang San (2022)… (provide 3–5 entries in the format author (year): one-sentence finding); length: 5,000–8,000 words, GB/T 7714 format.
Information
- Version
- v1
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
