Bibliometric Findings Writer
Turns VOSviewer/Bibliometrix data into prose
Bibliometric Findings Writer
Turns VOSviewer/Bibliometrix data into prose
Showcase
Description
Transforms the raw numbers from VOSviewer or Biblioshiny (Bibliometrix/R)—including keyword frequencies, citation network clusters, annual publication trends, and country/institution/journal distributions—into interpreted text ready for academic publication. Rather than repeating the numbers, it uses an academic tone to explain how the literature is evolving and avoids speculative causal claims. Suitable for researchers writing theses or articles who need to prepare a bibliometric analysis section but struggle to translate raw data into academic language. Usage: Paste the cluster/keyword list from VOSviewer or the Biblioshiny summary table directly; the skill names and interprets keyword clusters thematically, and evaluates citation networks and country collaboration patterns.
Related Skills
View all
ResearchMeta-Analysis Report
Produces a complete Methods + Results + Limitations text from your meta-analysis statistics (pooled effect size, I², Q, tau², and publication bias indicators), in line with PRISMA 2020 and the Cochrane Handbook. It never misinterprets I² values (including the percentage of variance explained) and avoids overstated causal language, using cautious wording such as “the findings are consistent with...” instead of “the evidence shows that...”. It also provides at least three potential reviewer questions and response statements that can help address them. Suitable for researchers writing a meta-analysis paper who want to strengthen their Methods section before journal submission. What it does not do: it does not calculate statistics from raw data (you must already have calculated your R/RevMan/CMA output); it only converts and interprets the results as academic text.
ResearchThematic Analysis & Codebook
Creates a systematic codebook and thematic map from your raw data excerpts or initial open codes, recommending codes in a parent-child structure for use in MAXQDA/NVivo. Supports inductive, deductive, or hybrid analysis approaches. Who it's for: researchers conducting thematic or content analysis.
ResearchPRISMA 2020 Flowchart Writer
For researchers conducting systematic reviews, this Skill generates flowchart text and a protocol paragraph that follow the PRISMA 2020 checklist. When you enter your database screening counts (identification → screening → eligibility → included), it checks the numbers for consistency and produces defensible text addressing a reviewer's question: "Why does your flowchart show so many losses?" It also converts your inclusion and exclusion criteria into a table in PICO/PECO format. This Skill is suitable for graduate students writing systematic reviews or meta-analyses, as well as journal editors conducting pre-publication checks. If it detects a numerical inconsistency (for example, included > eligibility), it states this clearly rather than silently correcting it.
Information
- Version
- v3
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
