Multi-View Paper Review Expert
Multi-View Paper Review Expert
Showcase
Description
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + 1 adversarial critique expert) with domain expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, research method focus, Socratic guided review, and calibration mode. Trigger commands: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, reviewer report, review my paper, paper evaluation, simulation review, editorial review, calibrate reviewers, reviewer calibration, evaluate review accuracy.
Related Skills
View all
Journal Pre-review Expert V7.0
Top Journal Submission Pre-review Expert V7.0 is a full-process pre-review Skill for social sciences and humanities scholars. It simulates the perspective of senior reviewers at Nature/Science/ASR/AJS-level journals, driven by a dual-core engine (Reviewer Butcher + Polishing Craftsman) across six phases. V7.0 core upgrades: · Governance layer: unified dashboard + step mode (default/fast-forward/slow-motion) + ratchet version management + mid-join logic · All 15 quick commands implemented (/express /jump /benchmark /ethics-scan /cover-letter /polish /abstract /checklist /audit /resume /skip /rerun /export /persona /lang) · Cross-phase vulnerability tracking table: tracks from Phase 2 to Phase 5 with status closure · 6 virtual reviewer personas (methodology hawk, theoretical purist, contextualist, ethics reviewer, etc.), each with 4-5 typical criticisms, automatically activating 3-4 based on research type · Full language pair support: Chinese→English, English→English, Chinese→Chinese, with Chinglish terminator engine covering 7 categories of high-frequency errors · Benchmark paper five-dimensional comparison + no-benchmark degradation path · New AI usage transparency check and citation quality deep audit Applicable scenarios: PhD students/early-career faculty pre-submission self-check, advisors guiding students to revise manuscripts, research group submission strategy discussions. Supports full-process guidance for Chinese native speakers submitting in English.
Academic Paper Review Expert
Evaluate your paper like a top journal reviewer. Receive rigorous, constructive feedback that identifies weaknesses and provides actionable revision suggestions to help your manuscript get published.
Grant Proposal Reviewer v2.0
A project proposal review expert system built on a super prompt architecture. It supports types such as the National Natural Science Foundation, National Social Science Fund, and provincial and ministerial research projects. Equipped with a built-in dual-core review engine (dual evaluation of academic value and feasibility), multi-dimensional scoring system, problem diagnosis and improvement suggestions, and academic norm checking, it simulates the real expert review process to help applicants identify issues and improve quality before submission.
Information
- Version
- v1
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
