文旅商项目深度拆解 4.0
战略思维、模式创新、场景设计、运营闭环
文旅商项目深度拆解 4.0
战略思维、模式创新、场景设计、运营闭环
Showcase
Description
顶尖文旅商战略咨询总监的硬核分析框架。基于成都源野、杭州天目里、阿那亚、长安十二时辰、上海TX淮海、景德镇陶溪川六大标杆案例，并融合唐山宴、河头老街、大连熊洞街、清明上河园四大实战案例反测迭代，升级为「阶段0·起点判定 + 十二维拆解法」。新增起点判定、IP产权属性判定、变现结构体检五查、资本动作与退出结构、竞争格局与替代威胁、单点依赖与组织可复制性检验六大维度，直击项目操盘底牌、算账逻辑、风险要害与资源适配性。适合文旅投资决策、项目操盘复盘、竞品战略分析。40分钟输出万字研报。
Why we love this skill
This skill uses an eleven-dimensional analysis method to deeply dissect cultural tourism and commercial projects, with new policy and digital perspectives, providing unique and incisive research reports—an indispensable tool for professionals.
Related Skills
View all
ResearchProject Proposal Expert v3.0
From vague ideas to logically rigorous application materials, even ordinary technical personnel can complete a 10,000-word argumentation report in 2 hours. Core Features: Eliminate empty language in applications: automatically strip out filler words like 'high-level' and 'significantly improved', use SCQA framework + Pyramid Principle to write quantified, logically rigorous arguments. Accurately identify innovation patterns: automatically analyze project characteristics, match three modes (autonomous originality, integrated innovation, iterative micro-innovation), give compatibility score and recommendation, avoid failure due to mispositioned innovation. Prevent logic gaps in argumentation: exclusive 'five elements + three chapters' structured output method, from project rationale to innovation points tightly linked, master 10,000-word deep report + high-definition technology roadmap. Zero experience required: no idea? Just input a one-sentence project idea (e.g., 'want to make a quantum sensor for gas leak detection'), system automatically completes 6 phases, outputs complete application materials. Usage: Open the dialogue box and directly input your project idea or upload existing materials; the system will guide you through the entire process: information collection → innovation mode selection → brief argumentation generation → full report generation → technology roadmap generation. Each phase has a confirmation mechanism, and you can flexibly exit and iterate. About V3.2: The new V3.2 version integrates five methodologies: SCQA framework, SMART principles, Pyramid Principle, Comparison-Difference-Advantage method, and Three-Dimensional Value method. It has been refined through real-world cases in quantum detection, smart elderly care, energy management, and other fields, locking in the underlying logic of research proposal success—an essential tool for successful project applications! Application scenarios: ✅ National Natural Science Foundation applications ✅ Provincial/municipal science and technology plan projects ✅ Enterprise technology innovation project initiation ✅ Graduate thesis proposal writing ✅ Technology achievement transformation plan design Core advantages: 🎯 Efficiency increase by 10x: from 2-3 weeks to 2-3 hours 📊 Quality professional guarantee: quantified indicators, rigorous logic, prominent innovation points 🔄 Flexible and controllable: each phase can be confirmed, modified, or exited 📈 Validated by real cases: successfully generated multiple 10,000-word deep reports Typical output examples: ✅ 10,000-word deep argumentation report ✅ High-definition technology roadmap ✅ Structured brief argumentation ✅ SCQA diagnostic analysis report ✅ Innovation mode compatibility assessment
Grant Proposal Review PRO V2.0
🎯 Core Functionality Overview This is an intelligent review and optimization system specially designed for national social science, education ministry, and provincial grant applications. It simulates the thinking mode of a senior review expert with 15 years of experience, ensuring academic rigor and competitiveness through three core mechanisms. 🔧 Three Core Mechanisms 1️⃣ 12-Step Structured Methodology Covers the full lifecycle of grant proposal review: Phase 1-3: Basic Diagnosis - In-depth analysis of announcement (funding priorities, review criteria, application requirements) - Cross-disciplinary type judgment (precise identification of 8 types) - Research GAP five-dimension identification (theory/methodology/empirical/policy/technology) Phase 4-7: Core Element Review - Research question TMAQ model analysis (theory/methodology/approach/question four dimensions) - Research objective SMART principle test - Research content framework completeness assessment - Research approach type matching (6 types) Phase 8-10: Deep Quality Enhancement - Precise extraction of key difficulties (distinguish criteria + breakthrough paths) - Innovation point seven-dimension mining - Feasibility seven-dimension argumentation Phase 11-12: Overall Optimization - Nine-dimension quality check (academic rigor, innovativeness, feasibility, etc.) - Comprehensive optimization suggestions and final report 2️⃣ Dual-Core Adversarial Mechanism (Builder vs Supervisor) Working Principle: - Builder (academic writer): Generates optimization plans based on user materials - Supervisor (top journal reviewer): Challenges Builder's plans with the strictest standards - Adversarial iteration: 3 rounds of confrontation to ensure plans are robust Application Scenarios: - Innovation point mining: Builder proposes innovation points → Supervisor questions novelty → iterative optimization - Feasibility argumentation: Builder designs plan → Supervisor challenges feasibility → supplementary argumentation - Literature citation: Builder cites literature → Supervisor verifies authenticity → ensure academic standards 3️⃣ Literature Authenticity Verification Mechanism Two working modes: Mode A: Placeholder Mode (Default) - Use markers like [Literature Placeholder-001] in place of specific references - Output a Literature Requirement List specifying search requirements for each placeholder - User searches and fills in real references Mode B: Real-Time Verification Mode - Call Google Scholar to verify literature authenticity in real time - Generate Literature Verification Report (authenticity/relevance/authority scores) - Ensure every citation is traceable Preventing AI Hallucination: - Prohibits fabricating authors, journals, DOIs - All references must be verified or marked as placeholders - Guarantees academic integrity bottom line 💡 Core Value and Applicable Scenarios ✅ Key Pain Points Addressed 1. Academic sloppiness: AI-generated content often includes fake references, logical gaps 2. Insufficient innovation: Difficulty uncovering true academic innovation points 3. Weak feasibility: Research plans lack systematic argumentation 4. Cross-disciplinary difficulty: Interdisciplinary topics often fall between two stools 🎓 Target Users - University faculty (social sciences, education, humanities) - Researchers (applying for national and provincial grants) - Academic teams (needing systematic review processes) 📋 Typical Workflow 1. Input: Upload announcement + proposal draft 2. Review: System executes 12-step structured analysis 3. Adversarial: Dual-core mechanism iteratively optimizes key sections 4. Verification: Literature authenticity check 5. Output: Complete review report + optimization suggestions + literature list 🔍 Differences from Traditional Review | Dimension | Traditional Human Review | Expert Review System | |-----------|------------------------|----------------------| | Review depth | Depends on personal experience | 12-step structured + 9D QC | | Academic rigor | Hard to fully audit | Literature verification + dual-core adversarial | | Innovation mining | Subjective judgment | 7-dimension systematic analysis | | Feasibility argumentation | Experience-driven | 7-dimension item-by-item argumentation | | Consistency | Varies by individual | Standardized process | | Efficiency | Days to weeks | 1-2 hours for initial review | The core advantage of this system is: it makes the tacit knowledge of a 15-year senior review expert explicit, structured, and replicable, enabling every user to receive top-level expert review services.
品牌解剖室（消费品牌）
大部分人看品牌，看的是官网、广告和热搜——那是品牌想让你看到的。真正的品牌逻辑，藏在产品结构、定价、渠道、爆款、用户讨论和财务报表里。这个 Skill 会把任意一个品牌，通过 2-4 轮联网深度调研，重建为从「创始原点 → 品牌形成 → 风格演变 → 产品资产 → 爆款形成 → 组织能力 → 品牌增长 → 当前状态」的完整 Operating System：覆盖创始人因果链（Founder → Brand Causality Map）、品牌历史与转折点、风格演变与 Brand Code、产品架构与 Hero Product Portfolio、成长路径与品牌资产演变，并沉淀为 Brand Operating System 系列文档（定位反推、叙事系统、投资者视角、组织能力、成长路径、产品规划 + 爆款生命周期与破圈路径研究）。严格区分有证据支持的事实与合理推断、逐条保留来源 citation，不编造数据、销量、排名、复购率、因果或引述。输出不是一篇品牌故事，而是一套可复用的品牌操作系统，供品牌战略借鉴与竞品分析。
Information
- Version
- v5
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
