Academic Writing Advisor
Deep writing system from concept to delivery
Academic Writing Advisor
Deep writing system from concept to delivery
Showcase
Description
Three-expert collaboration, six-dimension baseline, five-property comprehensive professional writing Agent (v2.1 Darwin optimized version, score 91). Core features: 1. Six-dimension content baseline [Way, Method, Technique, Tool, Change, and Trend] 2. Three-expert collaboration + three-gate audit 3. Chapter depth modeling (4 depth templates + quantitative anchors + six-dimension attribution mapping) 4. Five-property comprehensive constraint 5. Zero tolerance for hallucinations + three-level literature verification (V11 unified literature library) 6. Interrupted writing continuation (includes V12 six-dimension status + literature integration progress) 7. Mathematical formula Unicode symbol standards 8. Users can upload references/papers and forcibly integrate them 9. Five-state machine transitions + Pull interaction 10. Chapter-by-chapter saving and combined draft delivery + extra-long chapter volume mechanism 11. Illustration standards (C15, image requirements by six-dimension attribution) 12. C1/C2/C14 three-framework collaboration relationship description 13. V12 six-dimension coverage matrix tracking 14. Initialization six-dimension framework guidance 15. Degradation path for insufficient literature quality + six-dimension incompatibility exemption mechanism Supports automatic planning or user-uploaded table of contents, adapting to fields including computer science, AI, engineering, natural sciences, medicine, social sciences, etc.
Related Skills
View all
Academic Writing Engineering
An engineering collaborative agent for scholarly manuscript writing across disciplines, covering monographs, textbooks, chapters, institutional texts, management manuals, practical guides, and academic practice texts in natural sciences, engineering, humanities and social sciences, business, law, education, medicine, and more. It does not directly write the main text but follows a seven-stage engineering workflow: task scope diversion → outline lock-in → resource compilation → logical review → section-by-section writing → section-by-section confirmation → full-chapter consolidation. This ensures stable chapter structure, sufficient supporting references, consistent terminology, and precise, plain language, delivering robust manuscripts suitable for formal publication and core journal style. Core capabilities: • Four task scope types: full book / single chapter / outline only / special tasks (consolidation, de-AI rewriting, review response, etc.) • Three approaches for top-level outline: user-provided, system-designed, or editorial board style lock-in • Three differentiated options for second/third-level outlines (normative basic / logic-enhanced / practice-applied) plus a compound recommendation mechanism • LAF-7 seven-dimensional logical review (system completeness, hierarchy symmetry, sentence standardization, title conciseness, cross-chapter repetition rate, terminology standardization, publishing suitability) • Word count weight and title density matching to prevent fragmentation from overly dense third-level headings • Reference compilation and online verification (policies, standards, regulations, literature, cases, data) • Gated manuscript writing (refuses to write if any gate condition is not met) • Section-by-section writing, section-by-section confirmation, full-chapter consolidation and final review • Expert-level de-AI rewriting: diagnosis (generic words, sentence regularity, mechanical connectors, concept stacking, missing context, terminology drift) + rewriting (alternating long/short sentences, qualifiers, reduce template numbering, strengthen causal chains and logical closure) Discipline adaptation: Automatically switches to the corresponding discipline's language style based on the user's academic background and terminology system (e.g., STEM focuses on mechanisms and experiments, business on strategy and cases, law on statutes and precedents, education on theory and classrooms, medicine on evidence-based practice and procedures, etc.) without imposing a fixed disciplinary framework. Target audience: Authors of academic monographs, textbook editors, series editorial committee members, industry practitioners, graduate and doctoral supervisors, researchers and professionals undertaking the writing of management manuals, institutional compilations, and practical guides.
ResearchAcademic Paper Writing v4.1
A full-process academic paper writing system that combines the Five Sources model with the AFP 3.1 three-layer architecture. Other AI tools help you "write" a paper; this one helps you "plug" every hole that could get it rejected—from one vague idea to a complete submission package in a single run through seven modules, with an anti-hallucination gate, archive-code resume, and four-core review. [10-second value] One sentence of an idea → a submittable, complete paper package. Real sources are enforced throughout, every citation is verifiable, and you can resume across sessions right where you left off. [Trigger phrases] write a paper / literature review / research method design / how to write the discussion / paper polishing / abstract & keywords / submission package [Seven modules, all fully executable instructions] Phase 1 Topic & Introduction → Phase 2 Literature Review → Phase 3 Research Method Design → Phase 4 Discussion → Phase 5 Conclusion → Phase 6 Abstract & Keywords → Phase 7 Full-Text Integration & Submission Package. Phase 0 entry routes A–G map one-to-one to the seven modules, with an R option to restore your last progress via an archive code or archived document. [v4.1 upgrades] 1. Evidence-chain gate (hard constraint): a material registry (M1/M2 numbering) + four citation elements (author / year / title / verifiable locator) + three-color marking (✅ user-supplied / ⚠️ to verify / 🚫 prohibited). If the material library is empty, the system outputs only an outline and search queries and refuses to generate body text with citations; generating references from memory or fabricating volume, issue, or page numbers is forbidden. 2. Archive-code protocol: each module ends with a structured archive code that can be saved as a YouMind document. In your next session, simply reference it with @ to resume without re-requesting already locked information. 3. Reproducible scoring: the C core anchors all dimensions to behavioral standards scored at 4/6/8/10 with stated rationale; the ratchet mechanism only moves scores upward, never downward. 4. Four-discipline configuration library (1A Humanities & Arts / 1B Social Sciences / 2A Science & Engineering / 2B Agriculture, Medicine & Life Sciences), with automatic switching of theory libraries, method toolboxes, and disciplinary norms; Category 2B runs ethics review checkpoints at Phases 0, 3, and 7. 5. Three-paradigm routing (quantitative / qualitative / theoretical): literature review narrative strategies and research method design follow different paths. 6. Anti-cliché checklist and prohibitions: discussion sections using phrases like "limited time and energy" or "pending further research," conclusions introducing new data or literature, and abstracts containing claims unsupported by the body text are all sent back by the B core. 7. Adaptivity: user profile (beginner / intermediate / proficient) + paper type (journal / thesis / conference / course) + pacing mode (default / fast-forward / slow-motion) + multi-task isolation. 8. Submission package & compliance: seven consistency checks, a six-link logic chain, reference formatting (GB/T 7714 / APA 7 / Vancouver / IEEE), ethics approval number, data availability statement, generative AI use disclosure draft, and cover letter draft. [How to use] Tell the system: your discipline, target journal / paper type / word count, and which stage you're at. The system advances module by module, pausing after each one to deliver the section, review report, scorecard, and archive code, then waits for your confirmation before continuing. [Responsibility boundaries] The system handles sources 1–4 (structure, material organization, style, integration); source 5, human calibration, is yours: academic judgment, fact-checking, and innovation decisions. All ⚠️-marked citations and data must be verified by you item by item before submission; this skill does not promise any acceptance or pass outcome.
Paper Imitation & Pub. Expert
📚 Paper Imitation & Pub. Expert Develop an inspiring paper into your own high-quality original work step by step. Ideal for graduate students seeking to draw inspiration from excellent papers in other disciplines for topic migration, structural reconstruction, and submission optimization. 🔍 Inspiring Literature Identification: Analyze the reusable title mechanisms, problem awareness, chapter structure, theoretical framework, research methods, evidence organization, and language style of the model paper. 🔄 Interdisciplinary Paradigm Transfer: Build a 'source domain—target domain' transfer matrix to determine which ideas can be transferred and which theories, concepts, cases, and conclusions must be reconstructed. 🧠 Original Contribution Modeling: Identify literature gaps, distill core propositions and mechanisms, and check whether the paper merely changes the research object or applies a generic framework. 🧭 Research Design Planning: Supports theoretical research, case studies, qualitative research, quantitative research, literature reviews, policy text analysis, and mixed methods research. 🛡️ Real Evidence Gate: Do not fabricate data, samples, interviews, cases, statistical results, literature, or DOIs; without real evidence, do not generate false empirical conclusions. ✍️ Evidence-Driven Writing: Build argument chains via 'proposition—evidence—citation—rebuttal', generate original content chapter by chapter, and clearly mark research materials that need to be supplemented. 📈 Continuous Paper Evolution: Record each round of revisions, material gaps, and maturity changes according to L1 (topic conception), L2 (research plan), L3 (evidence formation), L4 (submission draft), and L5 (ready for submission). 🧑⚖️ Triple Simulation Review: Identify rejection risks from the perspectives of a theoretical reviewer, a method reviewer, and a target journal reviewer, and form specific revision strategies. 📨 Complete Submission Loop: Assist in generating the final paper, citation verification table, cover letter, innovation point statement, author response, revision index, and related declaration templates. ✨ Learn the paradigm, write original content, and enhance real submission competitiveness.
Information
- Version
- v9
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
